An unparalleled lawsuit has been filed in the financial office of the Tel Aviv District Courtroom towards Israeli unicorn Lusha, which 6 months ago, raised $205 million at a valuation of $1.5 billion. The lawsuit, filed by In addition Ventures venture capital fund and Oren Abekasis, are suing Lusha and entrepreneurs Assaf Eisenstein, his wife Anat Eisenstein, and Yoni Tserruya. In the accommodate, Additionally Ventures and Abekasis are demanding rights to a 35% of the firm’s shares.

The suit was filed via Advs. Zohar Lande, Eyal Nachshon, Dana Bookstein, and Naama Ben Aroush Moshe of Barnea Jaffa Lande & Co. legislation firm. According to the match, the Eisensteins and Tserruya fraudulently and driving the backs of the plaintiffs, undertook a approach meant to dispossess the fruits of the plaintiffs’ financial investment and shares, present them with phony presentations, and to steal from them the promising and rewarding enterprise and product in which they invested which includes their rights and to acquire the undertaking and product, to trade them and profit from the revenue.

The match states that the plaintiffs invested hundreds of thousands of shekels in the Neta Eisenstein corporation and cumulatively held 35% of its shares and rights. The plaintiffs did these kinds of out of faith in the company’s merchandise, in its eyesight, and in its direct entrepreneur, Assaf Eisenstein. During this period of time, the firm centered, among other matters, on improvement of the merchandise named Network Monkey, a world wide web browser include-on, which through monitoring and knowledge from world wide web platforms, assists end users in determining focus on populations suitable to their needs.

In apply, in its most recent kind, from March 2016, the products has been principally designed to serve as an world-wide-web browser incorporate-on, which allows end users, traveling to the LinkedIn website, to establish related targets and receive their personalized particulars. The lawsuit states that in the four yrs prior to the starting of 2016, the plaintiffs supported the company in normal and Assaf Eisenstein in specific, and worked with him in purchase to fulfill, acquire, implement, and advertise the company’s vision and dynamic targets, as well as the impressive and promising enterprise and product or service that it promoted.

Around the several years, the plaintiffs invested their dollars in the undertaking, in accordance to the needs of Assaf Eisenstein who was the entrepreneur, director, CEO and spirit driving the company, though they relied on his presentations and set their entire belief in him. In addition to their income, the plaintiffs invested their time and knowledge in the organization and advised Assaf Eisenstein.




Similar Articles or blog posts




Israeli B2B intelligence co Lusha raises $205m







“Only in hindsight did it turn out to be distinct to the plaintiffs, to their astonishment, that they ongoing to devote their income and devote assets to the corporation in reaction to Assaf Eisenstein’s requests, though he labored in the dim and driving their backs, along with his wife, in purchase to dispossess, oust and exclude the plaintiffs, and steal the enterprise and item in full from the plaintiffs, and the rest of the firm’s investors

“The plaintiffs also found that at some level, Assaf related with Yoni Tserruya with the objective of ousting and stealing the total venture and product or service from the plaintiffs and other company investors. It is also claimed that it grew to become apparent to the plaintiffs subsequently that in the beginning of 2016, at the same time that Assaf engaged in fake representation to the plaintiffs, professing the task experienced been concluded and experienced arrive as much as it could, Assaf connected to Yoni Tzeruya, and alongside one another, they established out on a joint venture, with the job and its products at its middle.” The two secretly recognized a new enterprise, although hiding their identity as shareholders, and they transferred the merchandise to this new corporate framework.

It is also claimed that, “Assaf and Yoni utilized the venture’s primary business program they stole the company’s business insider secrets as well as its technological know-how, such as the first code of its flagship item the two made use of the company’s crucial individuals, who secretly moved to employment at the ‘new venture’ and the two labored in the direction of the very same targets, ideas, consumers, shoppers, strategic plans, and improvement possibilities developed at the company they even manufactured use of the plaintiffs’ income, which was presented at the starting to fund the company’s tasks and solutions.”

The lawsuit promises that the code was established for an identical goal and is primarily based on an similar code, which underwent blurring and camouflaging. The plaintiffs declare that they did not know of this action. The accommodate adds that Assaf began, as another line of false representation and inappropriate pursuits, collectively with his spouse, who even served as a director of the company, to test and press for dismantling and liquidation of the Neta Eisenstein firm, even though hiding considerable points from the plaintiffs.

The suit promises that on March 18, 2016, the Eisenstein organization introduced the final variation of the product, Network Monkey, which was added to the Google Chrome app shop. It was subsequently found that on that precise working day, an identical variation of the application, identified as Lusha, was also extra to the application retail store. That merchandise, as the plaintiffs have realized a short while ago, was duplicated by Assaf Eisenstein and the progress and advertising and marketing groups at the Neta Eisenstein corporation. This was attained via a top secret and different company framework, and expertise of its existence was never ever shared with the plaintiffs and was retained from them.

In accordance to promises produced by the undertaking money fund, as a consequence of an investigation, they identified that from the beginning of 2016, Assaf Eisenstein began to “play a double match”, in which on the a single hand, he functioned in his a lot of roles at the Neta Eisenstein company and presented to the plaintiffs bogus displays, saying that the company was reaching the finish of its functions and was to be liquidated although on the other hand, Assaf Eisenstein was functioning in the shadows with his spouse to transfer the project into the new corporate framework, which he recognized with Yoni Tzeruya. According to the lawsuit, Eisenstein and Tzeruya were aware of the seriousness of their steps and consequently blurred their identities as house owners of the duplicated app, doing work for an prolonged period of time “below the radar.” Hence, as portion of the conspiracy that Eisenstein and Tzeruya set with each other, on Might 22, 2016, Assaf Eisenstein set up the Lusha Methods Ltd.

By an supplemental camouflage process, the company’s shares were not held right and in the name of the two “entrepreneurs.” Alternatively, they have been held in have confidence in, by means of Y.D.H. Trusts, Ltd. Subsequently, it turned recognised to the plaintiffs that the company’s shares have been held and equally divided (50-50) by Assaf Eisenstein and Yoni Tzeruya. The business then merged with a different enterprise with the name DEV YT LTD., which was owned by Tzeruya.

The lawsuit is also centered on an pro feeling, which establishes that the essence of the features, the consumer interface, and the person aspect code of just about every of the two apps are very similar to completely identical and that “there is no prospect of acquiring this amount of similarity, if the new application was made from scratch… there is no question that this is a hurried copy/paste of the unique software package challenge.” As if this isn’t sufficient, the skilled, Man Ronen, claims that in aspects where the two apps current small discrepancies in computer software, this is an exertion to “camouflage,” the duplication attempts, via the addition of the Lusha branding within the opening/closing of the app, has no logical justification.

The lawsuit, as stated, indicates that the venture capital fund found out that it experienced been a victim of fraud only thanks to content in “Globes”, which highlighted Lusha and interviewed its CEO Assaf Eisenstein, in December 2021. The plaintiffs found an article in “Globes” entitled, “We acquired lots of e-mail from cash, and we explained no many thanks: the startup that does not want investors.” The plaintiffs were shocked to find that the write-up incorporates an job interview with Assaf Eisenstein, who points out his doctrine with regard to interactions between business people and buyers. He is introduced in the posting as the person heading Lusha, and as ‘someone who experienced managed without having exterior funding until eventually 6 months formerly.’

No remark has still been gained from Lusha.

Published by Globes, Israel small business news – en.globes.co.il – on May well 8, 2022.

© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd., 2022.